dixi et animam vexavi

The Grammar of the Look

February 8, 2007 · 10 Comments

 II

God forgive me, but I decidedly hate chickens (the fowl). I had a bit less than to be able to say many in the home where I grew, which was that of my grandmother, a house situated on a foothill from where you could barely see the sea,(about which I always said that we had a proud vista of it), and a partial view of the old part of the city with its compacted houses and quite different from ours. Pervasively strange for me, even while the house and its environs were laid on a somehow perceptible slope our garden seemed placidly flat. When I was a kid, several times through living, I tried to teach some tricks to the few animals we had and kept in our scarcely spacious garden, loosely, and absentmindedly planted with some oranges, a fig, for some time a kaki.  There was a dear, immemorial but a finite mulberry which started their sequence, two peaches, several vines covering accidental patches of the spatial surroundings and others shadowing precise parts of the roof. And in the middle of all there was a lemon which in its best days timidly will mingle its branches with a rather daring but hollow pomegranate through which withes I always dreamed to hide, but invariably I would end to be embraced by the intimate shadow of the apathetic canes that were the border of the yard. Prod by Pavlov but mostly inspired from Chekhov’s “Kashtanka”, a book that I liked to open time to time, not as much because of those plotting impressions the first books I read knit in me which I failingly tried to unweave but mainly because its watery and uncontained, wine colored graphics, dispersed and borderless over the pages as on blotting paper, streamed, without loosing shape, vertically and quietly till they stood in abeyance, as some living tattoos on the boneless palm of the room or on the transparent abdomen of the garden, variably where I brought them, and they in turn suspending me while I was hastily pleasured by them because so I imagined it will be the memories I believed I would have, I could manage to teach how to perform some simple numbers to a duck, to a cat and to a rabbit. This last one I probably have only imagined. But exceptionally (from the other animals) I never succeeded, never achieved anything with chickens, no matter how hard and long, patiently and hardheadedly I tried for more than a year, it(the chicken) never learned anything, at all. I have never experienced something so distressing and gloomy and at the same time irritating, and perturbing because it was so excessively hopeless and inexorably stupid. I decided from that time to never permit myself to fall into the chicken trap again, as it was the first noteworthy trauma (drama) of my life, I definitely concluded and ruled that any time I will see patterns of that behavior to any object or living matter I would have to keep my unalterable or otherwise, only ever growing distances from them.

Categories: as random factoid

10 responses so far ↓

  • Elais // February 8, 2007 at 9:14 pm

    If you can’t teach, do (as in make it happen).

    As to the grammar/wording or lack thereof I will be quiet this time since I am still unable to decide whether it was intentional.

  • tan xhelo // February 8, 2007 at 10:50 pm

    Not “as to the grammar” but “as for the grammar”. You have separated the word ‘grammar’ form the word ‘wording’ with a solidus (/). Apart from the reason that ‘wording’ is distinguished from ’grammar’ as the first one denotes; choice of words; formulating, diction; verbal expression; stylizing, and thus one can not talk of the lack of it, because as long as there is a text, one can always talk for; misguiding formulations, frustrating diction; unintelligible or shallow verbal expression; idiosyncratic, apathetic or banal style etc. The solidus itself serves to indicate a choice between the words it separates. Most commonly known as ‘slash’, this symbol can be translated as ‘or’ and should not be used where the word ‘or’ could not be used in its place. I guess it has become obvious that in our case it is not rightly used. When you speak of grammar, you intend to speak of ‘grammatical errors’. How is this related by a choice of the kind – either this or that – to the way I write, that is to say, to wording?

    I didn’t understand your first sentence. If it is related to ‘teaching the animals or being unable to’ it is precisely what I meant.
    The text has been graded with an A in my Creative Writing Class. Though, yes, there are mistakes, because that is the first draft. The title of the thing might have helped you decide. In another instance: what about finding the same text in a book, not having the option of interaction with the author, how do you decide how you feel about what you read, knowing from the beginning that will never be revealed to you the intention of a certain style?

    …and yes, the piece (which is much longer) has to be edited.

  • Elais // February 9, 2007 at 12:33 am

    If you can’t teach, do (as in make it happen).
    - I meant that If you can not teach grammar or any other thing to any person, animal or thing then you, as well as the world, might be better off if you dedicated yourself to writing or mathematics or anything else as the possibilities are infinite.

    The comment was meant as a comforting word of sorts. Kind of a play on words from the known “Those who can’t, teach!”

    - I did not discern a lot of grammatical errors. However since the title was “grammar” I assumed that the wording used in some instances where more (or less) words were used was intentional and not for me to critique (nor comment on).

    e.x.
    quote=suggestion
    bit less than = a few less than
    where I grew= where I grew up
    proud vista of it = proud vista of
    finite mulberry= finite mulberry bush
    middle of all= middle of it all
    lemon= lemon tree
    ……

    - I have not questioned the creative qualities of the piece. It is well worth the A. No doubt about that one.

    P.S: I am a “Those who can’t, teach” type of gal myself . However, I can read a “do not disturb” note if you’ll post one of those.

  • tan xhelo // February 9, 2007 at 1:49 am

    I totally agree with the ‘lemon tree’…and no, I do not intend to post any note of the mentioned kind, you are welcome as it is everyone else. This is a public space, people are permited, if not invited – which will be absurd in view of being a public space – to say anything, and so am I…in this place. There are nither scissors nor barriers here. Anyone is on his or her own while given the freedom to say anything they like or feel bound to express. Again, you are welcome! Keep up the critical spirit!

  • J.M // February 10, 2007 at 9:25 am

    I really appreciated your part in response to chickens. This story sounds
    wonderful, to hear about the living tattoos on the boneless palm of the room
    and the transparent abdomen of the garden was vivid. I think that these
    human juxtapositions on things external are in the direction that I like in
    poetry. To see the imagination at work, the individual assertion of a things
    purpose and the philosophical implications of that thing, all explained from
    within the poet’s perceptions and understandings. The problem with this
    world is that our imaginations have grown weak, we have succumb to parasitic
    tendencies, suckling on television and media lives, having other things
    think for us. A great lack in contemporary literature seems to be one of the
    driest woes of our times, and of my life, to be born into such a culturally
    stale time. I must admit, of course, that there a million brilliant things
    happening right now, but on a whole the truth in art seems lost, distracted
    or forgotten. I feel like in those explorations of imagination we tend to
    reach higher levels of mental exercise and it is refreshing.

  • tan xhelo // February 11, 2007 at 9:43 am

    Well… thanks…is that really your website?

  • alb // March 26, 2007 at 8:26 am

    what a bloody mess here… listen… I’ll say something later on… at the moment I’m having some problems with my Ram…
    I’ll be back… I’ll be back… dont you worry…

  • d // March 26, 2007 at 8:51 am

    I meant my blog in Albanian Ramo, not this…clic on the d here…

  • d // March 26, 2007 at 8:53 am

    if you fail to understand that, here it is!

    http://metalepsies.wordpress.com/

  • alb // March 27, 2007 at 2:17 am

    I’ve seen that one too… don’t you worry… looks much better that this one… I might be wrong, but liked it definitely much more… long ago it was quite different than the present one… why did you changed it?
    Hey… hide your watching :D the hand was exelent…

Leave a Comment